MandM has moved!

You should be automatically redirected in 6 seconds. If not, visit
http://www.mandm.org.nz/
and update your bookmarks.

Monday, 22 June 2009

Anti-Smacking Referendum: Vote No Website Launched

Visit the official Vote No website to get an overview of the issues, facts and arguments as to why you should vote no in the upcoming referendum on smacking being de-criminalised. You can also pick up banners to advertise the site:
To put this banner on your site, copy and paste this code where you want it to sit:
<a href="http://www.voteno.org.nz"><img src="http://voteno.org.nz/img/side.gif" /></a>

11 comments:

  1. Great! I'll put a link up to the site, later.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hey guys, why don't you put one up on your own blog ? !!

    ReplyDelete
  3. No thanks, I prefer to parent my children properly. What would Jesus do? Jesus would take the time to enforce boundaries in a non-violent manner.

    ReplyDelete
  4. It doesn't fit in our sidebar. I'm trying to find a way of reducing the size a little. So far it is not working.

    Recent blog post: Sunday Study: The Virtue of Judging - Jesus was not a Relativist

    ReplyDelete
  5. Putting the banner on your site doesn't mean you smack your children, it means you recognise that smacking is not the same thing as child abuse and should not be treated identically by the law.

    My preference for parenting is much like yours; clear boundaries and expectations with loss of priviledges, extra chores around the house and groundings as consequences. I have my preferred parenting techniques and I don't like or tend to avoid using others that I view as either less effective or not as good for my children, and smacking falls into that latter category for me. However, I don't think that the techniques I choose to use should be the only ones that are legal, that just because I happen to view some other techniques as inferior that these should be criminal.

    I do not see evidence that smacking is remotely on par with child abuse. Child abuse injures, harms and psychologically damages children, a light smack does not.

    Recent blog post: Sunday Study: The Virtue of Judging - Jesus was not a Relativist

    ReplyDelete
  6. Got it to behave. It was rather tricky.

    Recent blog post: A Counter-Point on the David Bain Re-Trial

    ReplyDelete
  7. Great. Looks good !!


    www.yesvote.blogspot.com

    Enjoy

    ReplyDelete
  8. No thanks, I prefer to parent my children properly. What would Jesus do? Jesus would take the time to enforce boundaries in a non-violent manner.

    Apart from mere assertion, on what basis do you assert that its always improper to use force in correction.

    On what basis do you assert that physical force is violence?

    Where is any textual evidence Jesus would hold the position you assert he would, thats actual evidence not trendy liberal slogans.



    Recent blog post: A Counter-Point on the David Bain Re-Trial

    ReplyDelete
  9. For another good piece on this go to http://www.thenewzealandweek.co.nz and search "smack in the face" for the article: Citizens Initiated Referendum: A smack in the face

    Recent blog post: Air wars

    ReplyDelete
  10. For another good piece on this go to http://www.thenewzealandweek.co.nz and search "smack in the face" for the article: Citizens Initiated Referendum: A smack in the face

    Recent blog post: Air wars

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.

  © Blogger template 'Grease' by Ourblogtemplates.com 2008 Design by Madeleine Flannagan 2008

Back to TOP